How do you think UNA and NEO compare in terms of performance scalability for large social networks?

When we talk about performance scalability, we're essentially looking at how well the system can handle increased workloads. UNA, built on a PHP-MySQL stack, has a proven track record for a variety of social networking functions. However, PHP has limitations when it comes to real-time features, often requiring additional tech like WebSockets or third-party services to handle such capabilities.

On the other hand, NEO, generally built on more modern tech stacks, is designed with performance in mind from the ground up. It's optimized for real-time interactions and can seamlessly integrate newer technologies. Its architecture may offer advantages in terms of distributing workloads efficiently across multiple servers, but this often comes at the cost of a steeper learning curve and complexity.

So, if you're looking for ease of development and a wide range of plugins, UNA might be your go-to. But if real-time performance and scalability are your top priorities, then you might want to dive into the complexities of NEO. Both have their pros and cons, and the "best" option depends on the specific needs of your social network.