Category:
Created:
Updated:
The case for owning your community platform
Renting your community from a big platform is easy until the rules change.
Renting your community from a big social platform is easy, until the rules change. Reach drops after an algorithm update, a feature your members relied on disappears, or the terms shift in a way you can't accept. And when you decide to leave, you can't take your members with you.
What owning actually means
Owning the platform means your member list, your content and your moderation policies stay yours. You decide who can see what, how long things are kept and what happens when someone breaks the rules. Nobody else can change those answers for you.
How we do it
We run this network on UNA, on our own servers. That lets us extend it with our own modules when we need something specific, and ship the web and mobile apps from one backend instead of maintaining two systems.
The trade-offs
Owning isn't free. You're responsible for hosting, updates, backups and security, and you won't get millions of passers-by from an algorithm. For us, that's a fair price for knowing the community will still be here, on our terms, next year.
Comments (6)
-
A few points I cut from the post for length. First, we learned this the hard way when a platform we relied on changed its API terms overnight.
-
Being able to export everything at any time is underrated.
-
Owning the data also makes it much easier to talk honestly with members about privacy.
-
And you can build the features your community actually needs instead of waiting for someone else's roadmap.
-
Curious how others handle backups for a self-hosted network.
